Practical and Spiritual

Shedding light into the old religious debate.

I found out something new about myself this week. Well, it's not a big surprise or anything, I just had one of those moments when a light bulb blinks above your head... I found out I'm very practical. I'm the kind of person that would cook lunch and not wash the pot if I knew I'd have a similar dinner later. And I guess this is how I deal with almost everything. I try to be logical, efficient, straight forward. My actions usually have a point, even if the point is simply "to get happy". And since I'm like that, my automatic way of perceiving the world is to project this practicality onto others when trying to make sense of what they do. Well, now that I've realized this is just my perception, I can look at things from a new angle.


This simple thing sheds light into another topic: religiosity. I'm constantly wondering why some people really hang on to religion, because for me it's so easy to understand that religion was man-made, and even if God happened to exist, he's not anywhere to be seen. And a God who doesn't affect the world is as good as no God - for every practical purpose. But that's the thing. If you take out those who are religious only because they were born into it, never were taught how to think critically, or are afraid to get out for the imposed guilt, most of the real religious people are not in it for the practicality.

This must be difficult for some atheists to understand. From most of the arguments I hear from atheists trying to make sense of religious beliefs, I feel many atheists lean to the practical side like me. They tend to assume religious people are in it for the comfort, or because they got somehow lost in the search for truth and ended up in the wrong end of things. Atheists often argue against religion pointing out inconsistencies, logical flaws... Of course, this might reach to the not so religious people. But my guess right now is that the real superstitious people are not so practical about things. They don't want the facts, evidence, or things that actually work; they are looking for something beyond, something spiritual.

Duh, that's obvious!

But not as much as I might have thought. Their way of seeing the world is so unpractical that is probably unexplainable for someone who takes a more practical posture. So don't wait for an explanation here, because I still can't get it completely. I feel it's the same way I can't get poetry. For me it's like "oh cool, the words rhyme", but for others it releases feelings, emotions. I'm not saying I have no emotions: I do love, cry... I don't think anyone is entirely practical, in fact, I don't think anyone is entirely anything. There's no black and white. Nevertheless, there is a world of feelings connected to impracticality which I don't understand - and wish I could.

I guess the whole conflict comes about when the spiritual people try to bring any practicality to their spiritual search. When they start praying for things, talking about physical hell, virgin rewards, forbidden food, divine punishments - then they simply sound like fools, and rock the boat for all the other spiritual people. And when they try to change laws and impose weird systems of belief, they go from fools to intolerant bastards. There's nothing practical about spirituality. If God, ghosts, spirits, vampires, unicorns go beyond what's natural, trying to apply a cause-effect relationship to those is against their very nature. In Brasil people say that "God writes right along twisty lines", meaning we cannot read it. So even if there's a God and you think you are reading the lines, don't expect to convince any practical (or reasonable, for that matter) person, because it just doesn't make sense.

You know, just because I'm not here talking about the beauties of the spiritual world, it doesn't mean I'm against it. I'm aware that I might sound harsh sometimes. But the truth is that I see a lot of people who do get something out of the spiritual world, and I try to find it too, to have that experience. I want to get the most of my brief life, and maybe there's this whole world I'm missing out. And now that I've realized how practical I am I can start looking at a bigger picture. I read somewhere that while it's difficult for religious people to question their views, the non religious can change their opinions without major changes to their lives. I'm glad I'm in the flexible side, and I hope I can understand more about the other side with time. I think this new angle of practicality is a good beginning - what do you think? Am I totally off?

2 comments:

inspirationism said...

This hasn't gotten a comment yet?!

This is exactly what my most recent blog "Crescent Moon Shining through Clouds" was seeking! I am still in shock, it is like what you are saying is the complete opposite but at the same time we are pointing out similar points of view. And I read this article right when I am supposed to be studying for my Classical Heian Literature exam for tomorrow. I could almost swear you are plotting against me chapulina!

Loved your introduction - simply put but leaves so much to be interpreted. Although, to be blunt, I attempt to argue the spiritual/religious point in my blog I read yours to oddly find myself agreeing with your points. Is that messed up or what? Or a sign of a good change?

In any case, as we have agreed upon before, there is no static black or white. Yet your usage of this in your passage brought me out of my transcendental fantasy into the real world. Even though it is blatantly obvious to you for you to feel emotions, the way how you portrayed that emotions are counter-intuitive with being practical got me thinking. Is that truly how it is or has science been institutionalized as much as religion? Who ever said being religious conflicted with science? Read my newest blog for further discussion on this topic - I hope it will somewhat clarify my position to you.

To your last question, you are so close your hand is on fire (I don't know if you know this already, but when people hide things in the States and someone is attempting to find it we say 'you're getting warmer' when they are getting close. I don't know if others do this, but when you are really close I say, 'you're hand is on fire!'). However, you and I (and everyone else for that matter) have a couple more steps before we can reach a true understanding.

That is, to state it as clearly as my heavily verbose self can possibly do, unicorns and vampires are hardly constructs of religion used to describe something secular with practicality. I am afraid you will find that magic and religion and science have more in common than you originally thought. Primarily, the fact that science is an evolutionary offshoot of the prior should reveal to you their innate similarities.

Talk to you soon!

chapulina said...

Hello inspirationism! Thanks again for your insightful comments!

It gets confusing sometimes, for me it seems like the old debate of religion vs science has no meaning, since they are completely different, and as you agree, not necessarily mutually exclusive. In fact, the idea that religion and science may not go along with each other was presented to me for the first time here in Japan, when I got in touch with different cultures. Here I heard for the first time of people who do not believe in evolution or who reject the scientific method altogether. Until then, at least for me, a girl educated at secular schools and who got her first communion at church, the two were completely different. Here I was for the first time asked to choose between the two, and after a long time, here was where I realized that no, the two are completely different as I'd always thought. It's been a trip...

In this post, I tried to move a little beyond the religion vs science debate. Religion, as I see it right now, is an institutionalization of spiritual search, and as such has been constraining millions of people's right to search for their own spirituality in their own terms. Because, see, I think there is a value on spiritual search, which is unfortunately bastardized by religion.

As for science, you can see I didn't even mention it. Rather, I talked about practicality, about doing things with a strong sense of cause and effect. If I do this, this will happen; if I do that, nothing will happen - there's no reason to do that.

I don't know if it was clear in the post, but it was not my intention to put practicality and spirituality as black and white. As the title suggests, a person can be practical and spiritual at the same time (the rainbow-ed ying-yang had the same purpose). And my point with all this was that while it's ok to engage in a spiritual search while being practical about other things, assigning practicality to this search is the root of problems and disagreements. Religion itself is an attempt of being practical about spirituality, and we all can see how this is dividing our world.

I'm also going to comment on your post ;)

Just to finish, I'd like to show you this video which I ran into after writing this post. I think it is a very nice illustration of how spirituality can go along science. Science hasn't at any moment promised to bring meaning. Only the truth.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2nfXfTg92E

Post a Comment